top of page

Centrios Design Syst.

Product/Platform: Centrios

My Role: UI/UX Designer, Experience Strategy

Team: Engineering Manager, Product Manager, Business Analyst, Developers, UX/UI Designer

Year: 2024 - Present 

Overview

When I joined the Centrios team, I spent time studying the product across web and mobile to understand how the system worked end-to-end. During this process, I noticed increasing inconsistencies in the UI, patterns, interactions, and visual language across the platforms. As the product continued to evolve, these inconsistencies risked slowing development and creating fragmented user experiences.

Identifying this early, I championed the creation of a Centrios Design System to serve as a single source of truth for design decisions and product consistency.

Structural UX Challenges - 

  • Inconsistent UI patterns across web and mobile

  • No centralized design standards or reusable components

  • Repeated design and engineering effort for similar UI patterns

  •  Difficulty maintaining visual and interaction consistency as new features shipped

While the need for a design system was clear, feature delivery priorities often took precedence, delaying formal implementation.

My Role

As the Lead UX/UI Designer, I saw an opportunity to apply systems-thinking approach connecting users, devices, and access management into one cohesive ecosystem. By driving a unified UX strategy focused on clarity, scalability, and usability, we began to boost adoption, improve retention, and support sales growth through a more seamless and trustworthy experience across platforms.

My responsibilities included:

  • Auditing existing UI components and interaction patterns

  • Identifying inconsistencies across platforms

  • Defining foundational principles for system scalability

  • Proposing reusable component structures

  • Socializing the system concept with product and engineering teams

Because the system has not yet been prioritized for full implementation, I focused on introducing system thinking into active feature work while building the groundwork for future adoption.

Impact So Far

Although the design system is not yet implemented, this work helped:

  • Establish a shared understanding of consistency gaps across the product

  • Create a roadmap for scalable UI patterns

  • Introduce the concept of a centralized design source of truth

  • Lay the foundation for more efficient product development as Centrios grows

Foundation 

Space variables.png
Size variables.png
Border radius style.png
Frame 632031.png
Frame 143724833.png
Typography.png

Components

Screenshot 2025-07-16 at 8.13.30 PM.png
Screenshot 2025-07-16 at 8.45.29 PM.png
Screenshot 2025-07-16 at 8.45.48 PM.png
Screenshot 2025-07-16 at 8.17.21 PM.png
Screenshot 2025-07-16 at 8.44.35 PM.png
Screenshot 2025-07-16 at 8.44.15 PM.png
Screenshot 2025-07-16 at 8.18.58 PM.png
Screenshot 2025-07-16 at 8.18.43 PM.png
Screenshot 2025-07-16 at 9.19.18 PM.png
Screenshot 2025-07-16 at 9.32.40 PM.png
Screenshot 2025-07-16 at 8.20.21 PM.png

Documentation 

Mobile Typo.png
Web Type.png
Colour Usage.png
Input field -Doc.png
Spectral.png

Reflections

Strategic Value ≠ Immediate Priority

The Centrios Design System consistently fell behind feature work in prioritization, despite clear data supporting its long-term efficiency and consistency benefits. Critical product issues took precedence, reinforcing that value alone doesn’t determine roadmap position.

Influence Through Incremental Integration

Instead of waiting for full adoption, I embedded system principles where possible — improving consistency within active features and aligning standards with immediate business needs. Progress became incremental, not dependent on a single green light.

Alignment Over Advocacy

Advocating with numbers was necessary, but not sufficient. Design systems gain traction when tightly aligned with product goals, engineering bandwidth, and timing.

Sustainable system adoption requires strategic alignment, not just strong rationale.

bottom of page