top of page

Centrios Design Syst.

Product/Platform: Centrios

My Role: Product Designer, Experience Strategy

Team: Engineering Manager, Product Manager, Business Analyst, Developers, UX/UI Designer

Year: 2024 - Present 

Overview

When I joined the Centrios team, I spent time studying the product across web and mobile to understand how the system worked end-to-end. During this process, I noticed increasing inconsistencies in the UI, patterns, interactions, and visual language across the platforms. As the product continued to evolve, these inconsistencies risked slowing development and creating fragmented user experiences.

​

Identifying this early, I championed the creation of a Centrios Design System to serve as a single source of truth for design decisions and product consistency.

​

Structural UX Challenges - 

  • Inconsistent UI patterns across web and mobile

  • No centralized design standards or reusable components

  • Repeated design and engineering effort for similar UI patterns

  •  Difficulty maintaining visual and interaction consistency as new features shipped

​

While the need for a design system was clear, feature delivery priorities often took precedence, delaying formal implementation.

My Role

As the Lead UX/UI Designer, I saw an opportunity to apply systems-thinking approach connecting users, devices, and access management into one cohesive ecosystem. By driving a unified UX strategy focused on clarity, scalability, and usability, we began to boost adoption, improve retention, and support sales growth through a more seamless and trustworthy experience across platforms.

​

My responsibilities included:

  • Auditing existing UI components and interaction patterns

  • Identifying inconsistencies across platforms

  • Defining foundational principles for system scalability

  • Proposing reusable component structures

  • Socializing the system concept with product and engineering teams

​

Because the system has not yet been prioritized for full implementation, I focused on introducing system thinking into active feature work while building the groundwork for future adoption.

Impact So Far

Although the design system is not yet implemented, this work helped:

​

  • Establish a shared understanding of consistency gaps across the product

  • Create a roadmap for scalable UI patterns

  • Introduce the concept of a centralized design source of truth

  • Lay the foundation for more efficient product development as Centrios grows

Foundation 

Space variables.png
Size variables.png
Border radius style.png
Frame 632031.png
Frame 143724833.png
Typography.png

Components

Screenshot 2025-07-16 at 8.13.30 PM.png
Screenshot 2025-07-16 at 8.45.29 PM.png
Screenshot 2025-07-16 at 8.45.48 PM.png
Screenshot 2025-07-16 at 8.17.21 PM.png
Screenshot 2025-07-16 at 8.44.35 PM.png
Screenshot 2025-07-16 at 8.44.15 PM.png
Screenshot 2025-07-16 at 8.18.58 PM.png
Screenshot 2025-07-16 at 8.18.43 PM.png
Screenshot 2025-07-16 at 9.19.18 PM.png
Screenshot 2025-07-16 at 9.32.40 PM.png
Screenshot 2025-07-16 at 8.20.21 PM.png

Documentation 

Mobile Typo.png
Web Type.png
Colour Usage.png
Input field -Doc.png
Spectral.png

Reflections

Strategic Value ≠ Immediate Priority

The Centrios Design System consistently fell behind feature work in prioritization, despite clear data supporting its long-term efficiency and consistency benefits. Critical product issues took precedence, reinforcing that value alone doesn’t determine roadmap position.

Influence Through Incremental Integration

Instead of waiting for full adoption, I embedded system principles where possible — improving consistency within active features and aligning standards with immediate business needs. Progress became incremental, not dependent on a single green light.

Alignment Over Advocacy

Advocating with numbers was necessary, but not sufficient. Design systems gain traction when tightly aligned with product goals, engineering bandwidth, and timing.

​

Sustainable system adoption requires strategic alignment, not just strong rationale.

bottom of page